The findings from a 15-year, longitudinal study of more than 300 women in France, suggest that breasts would gain more tone, and would support themselves, if no bra was used. Why? Bras appear to limit the growth of supporting breast tissues, leaving the breast to wither and degrade more quickly. In fact, women who stopped wearing bras experienced a 7mm lift in their nipples each year that they did not wear a bra, and bra-less women developed firmer breasts, and stretch marks faded. And, in direct opposition to the myth that the bra eases back pain for women with larger breasts, not wearing a bra actually eased the pain, while wearing a bra did not.
holy shit what have we done to ourselves
This is a huge deal folks. We have literally been told that not wearing a bra is the worst thing a woman can do to herself. And I’ve always embraced that since I am a pretty big girl and I enjoy not having my knockers knocking around. But this….Well I don’t feel like I can go around outside without a bra, but I will from now on take it off at home (which i usually keep it on until bedtime) and where i’m comfortable…This really…is one of those things that changes everything.
as i read this aloud me and emma took off our bras
I almost never wear my bra at home. It’s uncomfortable and gives me shoulder/neck pains. I gotta wear it outside though because OH HEY NIPPLES. The damn thing also gave me an awful rash on my left side that lasted for over two weeks. This is apparently rather common, just never had it happen to me until now.
THE MORE YOU KNOW.
Reblogging for my gals
Everything I thought I knew about bras is a lie :U
A year ago this post led to my complete phasing out of bras and i couldnt be happier or more comfortable
I could’ve told you guys this
I stopped wearing bras 99% of the time like a year ago and my boobs have never been better
Bras are full of lies
YES ALL GIRLS SHOULD STOP WEARING BRAS IMMEDIATELY. DEFINITELY. IT’S FOR YOUR HEALTH.
YOU CANT JUST NOT WEAR A BRA THOUGH BECAUSE YOU GET CALLED A SLUT
This specifically refers to a hand striking the side of a person’s face, tells quite a different story when placed in it’s proper historical context. In Jesus’s time, striking someone of a lower class ( a servant) with the back of the hand was used to assert authority and dominance. If the persecuted person “turned the other cheek,” the discipliner was faced with a dilemma. The left hand was used for unclean purposes, so a back-hand strike on the opposite cheek would not be performed. Another alternative would be a slap with the open hand as a challenge or to punch the person, but this was seen as a statement of equality. Thus, by turning the other cheek the persecuted was in effect putting an end to the behavior or if the slapping continued the person would lawfully be deemed equal and have to be released as a servant/slave.
THAT makes a lot more sense, now, thank you.
GUYS I SAW THIS ON TWITTER IS IT TRUE HAHAHHA
where’s this from?????
Miley Cyrus and her love for Paparazzi
cries because this adorable kid
Okay. The hobbit was written in a time period where woman didnt play a large part in society. It was written by a man. This book means a lot to me and other people I don’t think that they should change the movie just because today’s society. It makes sense that women don’t have a role it the books. This just upsets me.